Public Comment

U.S. federal debt has passed $40 trillion, while higher Treasury yields are making new borrowing and refinancing more expensive. The problem is structural rather than tied to a single annual budget: federal spending, tax policy, demographic pressures and rising debt service all affect the long-term gap between revenue and obligations. Economic growth can improve the ratio of debt to the economy, but sustained deficits can also raise future interest costs and reduce fiscal flexibility. Congress therefore faces choices about spending growth, taxes, major benefit programs and how quickly deficit reduction should occur. A debt target only becomes meaningful when people say which tradeoffs they will accept. The harder question is whether deficit reduction should fall mostly on spending, revenue, or a slower combination of both.

Which path should Congress prioritize to put federal debt on a sustainable trajectory?

Overall results

1
69% support · excluded by 4%
7

A $40 trillion debt problem is too large for one politically convenient lever. A durable agreement should phase in both spending and revenue changes so neither side can pretend its priorities are costless.

7

Gradual reforms announced well in advance give households, businesses and agencies time to adjust while improving the government’s long-run fiscal path before debt service consumes more flexibility.

2
50% support · excluded by 2%
7

Congress will never stabilize the debt by trimming minor programs while the largest categories keep growing automatically. Long-term reform has to address the spending promises that drive future deficits.

7

Raising more revenue without first changing spending incentives just gives Washington another stream of money to exhaust. Put hard limits on spending growth before asking households for more.

3
48% support · excluded by 8%
7

Social Security, Medicare and safety-net programs are not ordinary discretionary purchases for the people who depend on them. Revenue should rise before benefits that families planned around are reduced.

7

The tax code contains expensive exclusions and preferences that function like spending through another door. Broadening the tax base can reduce deficits without simply raising every tax rate.

4
32% support · excluded by 14%

About the author