Public Comment

California is considering how its worker-notification system should address job losses caused by artificial intelligence and automation. Governor Gavin Newsom ordered agencies to study technological displacement, while pending SB 951 would impose AI-specific requirements around qualifying mass layoffs, including advance notice and information about the technology involved. Existing Cal-WARN law already governs many large layoffs, but the proposal raises a distinct issue: whether employers adopting labor-saving technology should have additional disclosure and worker-transition duties specifically because automation caused the reduction. Companies should be able to modernize, but workers should not learn overnight that a technology investment eliminated jobs management had planned to remove for months.

When AI causes mass layoffs, what notice should California workers get?

Overall results

1
71% support
7

Major automation gains may justify a structured transition without preventing firms from adopting technology that genuinely improves productivity.

7

Workers who bear concentrated short-term costs should have a realistic path to new employment rather than only receiving information about their replacement.

2
45% support
7

Clear thresholds can give workers transition time without regulating every software purchase or routine productivity improvement.

3
33% support · excluded by 24%

About the author