Public Comment

Benzie County's August 4 proposal to reset its operating millage failed by only nine votes. The proposal would have increased the county operating rate from its Headlee-reduced level and consolidated some special-purpose funding into the general fund. County officials argued that decades of rollbacks had reduced the buying power available for services such as road patrol, emergency management, courts and administration. Because voters rejected the reset by the narrowest possible political margin, officials now face a choice between accepting current revenues, returning with a smaller proposal, or asking voters to reconsider a similar restructuring. Nine votes is still a loss, but it is not a clear mandate for either deep cuts or the exact proposal that just failed.

After a nine-vote defeat, what should Benzie County do with its operating millage?

Overall results

1
54% support · excluded by 7%
7

Such a close vote justifies a transparent review of which services belong in general operations and which should remain separately voter-approved.

7

Before asking again, officials should show plainly what gets cut, what gets consolidated and what each alternative costs.

2
50% support · excluded by 4%
7

Keeping core county services viable matters, but a smaller request may better fit household budgets in a rural community.

3
46% support
7

The county asked voters directly and lost, so the first response should be spending changes rather than another tax vote.

About the author