Public Comment

Texas launched its Education Freedom Accounts program for the 2026-27 school year after the Legislature passed Senate Bill 2 in 2025 and funded the program with $1 billion. The application window ran from February 4 to March 31, 2026. The state says more than 100,000 students have been awarded accounts, with private-school awards tied to 85% of statewide average public funding per student, set at $10,474 for 2026-27, and up to $30,000 for eligible private-school students with disabilities. The dispute is what the program should be judged by. Supporters say it gives families more control and new options. Critics say vouchers may mostly help families already outside public schools, drain public-school support, or create uneven access if rural families have few private options. The public choice is about accountability, fairness, and whether state education dollars should follow students into private and home-based settings. Choice is useful only if it works for ordinary families, not just families who already had options. Texas should measure who actually benefits.

What would count as success for Texas Education Freedom Accounts?

Overall results

1
56% support · excluded by 6%
7

The fairest test is whether the program helps families who had the fewest choices before. Public dollars should not mainly subsidize people already able to pay.

2
55% support · excluded by 6%
7

If families are applying in large numbers, the state should not treat choice as a tiny pilot. Parents want options that fit their child.

3
49% support · excluded by 11%
7

If public dollars leave the public-school system, taxpayers need basic data: spending, outcomes, fraud controls, and whether students are actually served.

4
44% support · excluded by 6%
7

Public money should strengthen the schools open to every child. Vouchers create escape hatches instead of fixing the shared system.

5
44% support · excluded by 14%
7

Public schools still educate most children. Texas should slow expansion until it knows whether districts are losing money they need for staffing and services.

About the author