Public Comment

San Antonio officials are working through a projected $158 million general-fund gap over two years. The city manager's proposed fiscal 2027 budget includes about $41 million in cuts and what would be the city's first property-tax rate increase in roughly 30 years. Council members have objected to proposed reductions affecting public health, libraries and other programs, while tax opponents argue the city should find deeper savings instead. Rejecting the proposed tax increase would require roughly another $29 million in cuts, making the decision a direct tradeoff among taxes, fees and service levels. Families feel a tax increase, but they also feel a closed library, a slower city service or a higher user fee. The tradeoff should be explicit.

Where should San Antonio close its two-year budget gap?

Overall results

1
64% support
7

Spreading adjustment across several tools can avoid both a sharp tax increase and concentrated damage to a handful of public services.

7

Fees make sense where a service has a clear user, while broad services such as libraries and health require a broader revenue base.

2
50% support · excluded by 5%
7

A recurring deficit should be closed with recurring revenue and savings rather than one-time fixes that postpone the same gap.

3
36% support · excluded by 14%

About the author