Public Comment

The federal government has extended a Jones Act waiver for another 90 days beginning August 17, allowing specified cargoes to move between U.S. ports on foreign-flagged vessels under emergency conditions. Updated procedures require information about U.S.-flag vessel availability and the national-defense need for a waiver. The Jones Act normally reserves domestic waterborne cargo movements for qualifying U.S.-built, U.S.-flagged, and U.S.-crewed vessels. Waivers can expand shipping capacity during disruptions, but repeated or broad waivers can reduce the commercial protection intended to sustain a domestic merchant-marine and shipbuilding base. A shipping rule meant to preserve American maritime capacity loses its purpose if every emergency becomes a broad exemption. But keeping the rule rigid when domestic vessels genuinely cannot move critical cargo can raise costs and deepen a shortage.

When shortages or security crises hit, how readily should the Jones Act be waived?

Overall results

1
63% support · excluded by 6%
7

A vessel-availability test gives American operators the first opportunity to carry the cargo while still allowing foreign capacity when the domestic fleet truly cannot respond.

7

Narrow waivers reduce the risk that emergency authority quietly becomes ordinary shipping policy and make each decision easier to audit afterward.

2
51% support · excluded by 2%
7

Emergency logistics should use any safe available vessel rather than allowing a domestic-shipping rule to become a bottleneck for fuel, food, or essential materials.

3
44% support · excluded by 10%
7

Domestic maritime capacity will never grow if foreign vessels repeatedly receive access whenever using American ships becomes inconvenient or more expensive.

4
42% support · excluded by 6%
7

A time-limited waiver for specified cargo can increase capacity without suspending the entire coastwise shipping system or creating a permanent exception.

7

The government should show that the public benefit from lower prices or better availability is substantial enough to justify temporarily relaxing domestic-industry protections.

About the author