Public Comment

Northport’s proposed FY 2026–27 budget includes a possible 20% water-rate increase while the village waits for a water-rate study. Council also discussed capital projects, including Rose Street culvert work, marina infrastructure improvements, water-system projects, Master Plan funding, street funding, and adding a fourth full-time Department of Public Works position. The debate is how quickly the village should raise rates and fund infrastructure. Higher rates may help pay for water-system needs and reduce pressure on the General Fund. But residents and small businesses may feel rate increases sharply, especially if they are not convinced the increase is tied to a clear long-term plan. Infrastructure has to be paid for, but a 20% water-rate jump needs a clear explanation residents can check against the actual plan.

How should Northport handle its FY 2026–27 budget and water-rate increase?

Overall results

1
74% support
1

Water, streets, marina infrastructure, and staffing should be ranked together instead of explained as isolated budget lines.

1

People can accept hard costs better when they can see which projects are funded, when they happen, and why.

2
45% support · excluded by 7%
7

Water systems do not get cheaper when maintenance is deferred. Rates need to reflect the real cost of service.

2
45% support · excluded by 7%
7

Before raising water bills, the village should prove every added position and project is more urgent than household affordability.

4
33% support · excluded by 4%

About the author