Public Comment

Northport and Leelanau Township have been discussing how to add more affordable housing, attainable housing, or workforce housing. Buster Dame Recreational Field, a township-owned park with a baseball field and other recreation uses, was discussed as one possible site because it is public land in a residential area. Some residents strongly oppose using it for housing and want the park protected. Local officials have also discussed other public parcels, including 7th Street, High Street, and West Street, as well as tools like nonprofit partnerships, tax incentives, and a public-land inventory. No final decision in this poll is assumed. The question is how officials should balance housing need, park protection, cost, legal limits, and public trust. Public land can sometimes make housing easier to build, but parks and recreation spaces are also long-term public assets. A good local process may need to weigh urgency, fairness, site costs, legal restrictions, and neighborhood fit.

Which path should Northport-area officials prioritize for affordable housing while also protecting public recreation space?

Overall results

1
58% support · excluded by 7%
6

Northport needs more year-round housing for workers, families, and services. Public land can lower project costs, so every legally usable site should remain on the table.

5

A long process can become a way to avoid action. Officials should use nonprofit partners, tax tools, and public land now while still giving residents a clear review process.

2
54% support · excluded by 5%
7

A ranked inventory could show which land has utilities, safe access, lower site costs, and fewer legal limits. That is better than arguing parcel by parcel.

5

The village and township should compare all public parcels using the same public criteria before picking a site. That would build trust and avoid rushing into the most controversial option.

3
48% support · excluded by 13%
7

Other parcels are already part of the housing discussion. Officials should test those sites first before putting a working park back in play.

4
45% support · excluded by 11%
7

A limited plan could preserve the public value of Buster Dame while still addressing housing need. But it should happen only if legal limits are met and recreation is truly replaced or improved.

5
44% support · excluded by 14%
7

Housing is important, but starting with a beloved park risks dividing the community. Officials should protect Buster Dame and find a less harmful site.

7

Buster Dame is already serving the public as a park and ball field. Once parkland is converted to housing, it is hard to get that open space back.

About the author