Public Comment

The National Design Studio is an executive-branch effort to improve federal websites, including a plan to overhaul thousands of dot-gov sites. Recent reporting has also raised privacy concerns around redesigned or newly operated government websites involving services such as passports, prescription drugs, children’s accounts, and voter registration. The dispute is whether faster, more usable federal websites should be treated mainly as service modernization, or whether any centralized redesign must first satisfy strict privacy impact assessment, records, procurement, cybersecurity, and public-disclosure rules. Better government websites are worth doing, but usability cannot become a shortcut around privacy law.

What privacy standard should apply when the White House redesigns public federal websites?

Overall results

1
61% support · excluded by 2%
7

Independent review would separate ordinary design improvements from data architecture and surveillance risk.

7

If one White House office can rebuild public-facing services, oversight should not depend on trust in whoever occupies the White House.

2
50% support · excluded by 2%
7

Agencies with statutory duties should operate their own sensitive systems instead of routing trust through a political office.

3
48% support · excluded by 14%
7

Privacy reviews can be built into the launch process instead of used as an excuse for delay.

7

A passport or voter-registration site is not a normal marketing page. Sensitive data needs review before launch.

4
40% support · excluded by 6%
7

People hate broken government websites. If every improvement waits for years of review, nothing changes.

About the author