Public Comment

Texas Governor Greg Abbott asked federal officials to investigate washing facilities associated with Muslim ritual ablution at Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston's George Bush Intercontinental airports and threatened state funding consequences. DFW subsequently halted plans for additional facilities. Supporters describe the fixtures as ordinary washing infrastructure usable by any traveler; critics question whether airport spending is improperly supporting a religious practice. The broader governmental choice is whether such facilities should be evaluated by neutral criteria like accessibility, sanitation, traveler demand and general availability, or restricted when a specific religious use helped motivate them. Government should neither sponsor religion nor single it out. The cleanest rule is one that can be applied to the same facility regardless of who uses it.

What standard should Texas use for washing facilities at publicly funded airports?

Overall results

1
52% support
7

Public airport dollars should pay for ordinary transportation needs rather than amenities designed mainly around one religious practice.

2
52% support · excluded by 5%
7

A fixture available to everyone should be judged by ordinary public-facility rules rather than the religion of travelers who may especially value it.

3
45% support · excluded by 5%
7

If anyone can use the facility and it solves a real airport need, labels about who inspired it should matter less.

About the author