Minnesota Chapter 114 sends voters a constitutional amendment changing how the permanent school fund is invested, managed, and distributed. The proposed text would treat the fund as a perpetual financial resource, require annual distributions while preserving purchasing power over time, and balance current and future beneficiaries. The ballot language says the change is intended to increase funding distributed to school districts without raising individual income or property taxes. The core policy question is how much current students should receive from an inherited endowment without weakening the real value available to future students. An endowment exists to serve people today and tomorrow. Distributing too little can leave current classrooms underfunded while wealth accumulates; distributing too much turns a permanent asset into a temporary budget source.