Public Comment

DOJ’s new Model Cities Initiative directs nearly $300 million toward a whole-of-city public-safety strategy and expects to select only two to four cities with populations of at least 100,000. Eligible uses include personnel, technology, behavioral-health services, reentry, victim services, and youth intervention. Applications are due September 1, with initial awards anticipated later in 2026. Concentrating the money could produce large, visible demonstrations in a few places; spreading it more widely could reach more communities but make each award smaller and potentially less capable of testing an integrated strategy. A few cities receiving enough money to change multiple systems at once could show what works. The downside is that hundreds of other cities may receive nothing, and a demonstration program is only useful if its results can actually be compared and replicated.

How concentrated should a major federal public-safety grant program be?

Overall results

1
52% support · excluded by 4%
7

Smaller prevention, behavioral-health, victim, and reentry grants should not disappear simply because a city is not selected for a major policing-centered demonstration.

7

Requiring common outcome measures across both tiers would make the program more useful than either a handful of showcases or many unrelated small grants.

2
52% support · excluded by 4%
7

Local governments know their own safety problems better than federal officials choosing a few winners through a national competition.

3
48% support · excluded by 4%
7

Serious violent-crime problems often cross policing, courts, treatment, victims, and reentry, so a few sufficiently large awards can address the whole system instead of funding fragments.

4
46% support · excluded by 12%
7

A larger cohort lowers the stakes of choosing the wrong two or three cities and provides more opportunities to adapt successful approaches across different local economies.

7

More cities would generate a wider range of evidence about what works while still leaving each jurisdiction enough money to build a meaningful program.

About the author