Public Comment

Kalamazoo is completing the Strategic Vision portion of Imagine Kalamazoo 2035 after nearly two years of public engagement. The draft identifies goals involving housing, economic vitality, transportation, community trust and safety, youth and families, environmental sustainability, arts and public spaces, and effective city operations. The city says the Strategic Vision will guide priorities, services, investments and partnerships, while the subsequent Master Plan will translate that direction into land-use, housing, transportation and neighborhood strategies. Public comments on the draft are being incorporated before City Commission consideration, with Master Plan work continuing afterward. A vision document can say yes to almost everything. The useful part is deciding what residents should be able to look back on ten years from now and say actually changed. I want the city to be clear about the outcome it will organize money and attention around.

Which outcome should most clearly define success for Kalamazoo's next ten-year vision?

Overall results

1
57% support · excluded by 9%
7

A successful city is more than its buildings. Youth opportunity, safety, family supports and social connection can determine whether neighborhoods actually feel healthy.

2
55% support · excluded by 2%
7

Heat, storms, parks and environmental quality directly affect public health and long-term costs. Investments made now can prevent more expensive problems later.

3
49% support · excluded by 6%
7

Housing instability cascades into health and social-service needs, making it a useful anchor for broader policy.

7

If people cannot afford a stable home, gains in other areas become harder to enjoy. Housing costs shape family finances, school stability and whether residents can remain in the city.

4
46% support · excluded by 6%
7

Streets, transit, water systems and safe routes are basic city functions. Reliable infrastructure improves daily life across income and neighborhood lines.

5
39% support · excluded by 13%
7

A city needs durable employment and household income to sustain other improvements. Job access should be treated as an outcome, not merely assumed to follow from development.

About the author