Public Comment

Michigan funds state parks and recreation in part through the Recreation Passport. The state says the Recreation Passport increased by $1 effective January 1, 2026, under an inflation-linked statutory adjustment. State parks support outdoor recreation, tourism, trails, boating access, and local economies. The policy question is whether funding should come more from user fees, general state dollars, private partnerships, or a mix. Michigan’s parks are part of the state’s identity. The funding model should keep them affordable while paying for maintenance honestly.

How should Michigan expand funding for state parks and recreation areas?

Overall results

1
54% support · excluded by 6%
7

Different facilities need different tools: trails, campgrounds, and boat launches do not all have the same revenue base.

7

A mixed model avoids overloading either visitors or the general budget.

2
53% support · excluded by 8%
7

People who use the parks regularly should help pay for maintenance and improvements.

7

A modest fee increase can support parks without creating a large new tax.

3
50% support · excluded by 2%
7

Stable public funding can keep access affordable for families.

7

Parks are public assets, not just amenities for people who can pay more.

4
42% support · excluded by 8%
4

Private sponsorships can support improvements without raising taxes or fees.

About the author