Public Comment

Ohio is considering whether graduation from an American Bar Association-accredited law school should remain the standard educational route for admission to the state bar. The Ohio State Bar Association, Federal Trade Commission and other groups have supported allowing additional recognized accreditors, while opponents argue that ABA accreditation supplies consistent educational quality and interstate portability. The question has become more consequential as the federal government separately considers ending the ABA's status as the federally recognized law-school accreditor. Ohio therefore must decide how much competition and flexibility it wants in legal education without weakening professional standards. One accreditor creates consistency but also enormous gatekeeping power. Competition can lower barriers only if alternative standards still mean something.

Who should be allowed to accredit the law schools Ohio recognizes?

Overall results

1
55% support · excluded by 10%
7

Ohio can create competition without abandoning quality by establishing measurable requirements for curriculum, outcomes, finances and student protections.

7

More legitimate pathways could reduce training costs and expand the supply of lawyers in communities where legal services remain expensive or scarce.

2
52% support · excluded by 5%
7

National portability has real value, and reform should not leave graduates holding credentials that other states will not recognize.

3
43% support · excluded by 5%

About the author