Public Comment

Leelanau County’s administrator has been placed on paid administrative leave pending an internal investigation. The county has said the action is procedural, that no findings or conclusions have been reached, and that an interim administrator is serving to keep county operations moving. The public has an interest in knowing whether county government is stable, accountable, and using taxpayer money properly. At the same time, personnel matters can involve privacy, due process, legal exposure, and facts that are not ready for public release. The debate is how much the county should disclose while an investigation is still pending. The county should not hide behind process, but it also should not wreck a fair investigation just to satisfy rumor.

How transparent should Leelanau County be while its administrator is on leave?

Overall results

1
53% support
8

A person should not be tried by press release before an investigation reaches findings.

2
52% support · excluded by 6%
7

When public officials are paid by taxpayers, secrecy should be the exception, not the reflex.

3
50% support · excluded by 3%
7

Paid leave uses public money, so the public deserves a final explanation that is more than ‘handled internally.’

7

The line should be privacy during the investigation, accountability after the investigation.

4
45% support · excluded by 3%
7

The county can say what step the process is in, who is handling operations, and when the board expects to revisit the issue.

About the author