Public Comment

Virginia has become a major data-center hub. In 2026, lawmakers considered numerous data-center bills covering issues such as energy cost shifts, water reporting, oversight, and tax policy. Recent reporting has also described local electricity-cost pressure and a new tax on data-center electricity usage tied to Virginia’s budget agreement. Supporters say data centers bring investment, tax revenue, and digital infrastructure. Critics worry about electric bills, grid reliability, water use, noise, land impacts, and whether incentives still make sense at this scale. Virginia should not chase away every data center, but the public needs proof that growth will not quietly raise bills or overwhelm local systems.

Which guardrail matters most for Virginia’s data-center growth?

Overall results

1
60% support · excluded by 2%
7

If a company gets public tax breaks, the public should get enforceable promises in return.

7

Virginia can support the industry while ending blank-check incentives.

2
52% support · excluded by 4%
7

A power-use tax is cleaner than hidden cost recovery through general utility rates.

7

If data centers drive major power demand, their tax bill should reflect that load.

3
46% support · excluded by 5%
7

Local governments should not have to evaluate regional grid, water, and air impacts alone.

7

Standard reporting lets regulators compare projects instead of negotiating blind.

4
42% support · excluded by 4%
2

If Virginia makes itself too hard to build in, projects and jobs will go to states with fewer barriers.

About the author