Public Comment

About 63% of Kalamazoo County voters approved an eight-year early-childhood millage in August. The new revenue is intended to support higher compensation for child-care workers and tuition assistance for families who do not qualify for existing state help. That creates an implementation tradeoff: increasing worker pay can stabilize providers and preserve seats; lowering tuition directly improves affordability; and investments in provider capacity, quality and hard-to-serve hours may expand the supply of care. The county now has to decide how to balance these connected goals. Cheap child care is not useful when there are no openings, and more openings are not useful when families cannot afford them. The millage has to address both sides.

What should Kalamazoo County's new early-childhood millage buy first?

Overall results

1
71% support · excluded by 5%
7

A balanced formula can track whether affordability improves without paying for subsidies that families cannot use because seats are unavailable.

7

Families need both a price they can afford and a provider with space during the hours they actually work.

2
50% support · excluded by 5%
7

Child-care classrooms cannot stay open when skilled workers can earn more in less demanding jobs elsewhere.

3
29% support · excluded by 14%

About the author