Public Comment

Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed a bipartisan law covering youth online safety, artificial intelligence regulation, and workforce upskilling. The governor’s office described it as a multi-pronged bill meant to protect children and adults from harms linked to youth social media addiction and the growing use of artificial intelligence. The debate is how to make digital safety rules meaningful without blocking useful technology. Supporters say young people need guardrails around addictive design, manipulative chatbots, and unsafe AI use. Critics worry that broad rules could burden schools, small companies, parents, or beneficial educational tools. The state also has to balance protection with digital literacy and workforce preparation. Parents want children protected, but kids also need to learn how technology works. Connecticut should not choose between safety and preparation.

Which protection should come first in Connecticut’s new digital-safety law?

Overall results

1
52% support · excluded by 6%
7

Parents need simple controls and clear notices, not a 40-page terms-of-service document.

2
51% support · excluded by 3%
7

Children should not be the test subjects for addictive feeds and manipulative tools. Safety rules should come before market convenience.

3
51% support · excluded by 6%
7

A state-by-state rulebook is hard for schools and companies. Federal standards would be clearer.

4
49% support · excluded by 6%
7

Small education companies should not face the same compliance burden as giant platforms. Rules need scale.

5
47% support
7

Students need to understand AI because it will affect jobs. Banning or warning is not enough.

About the author