Public Comment

Modern farm equipment often depends on software, diagnostic tools, emissions controls, and manufacturer-controlled parts. EPA issued 2026 guidance saying the Clean Air Act supports lawful repair of farm and other nonroad diesel equipment and that manufacturers cannot use that law to justify blocking access to repair tools or software. The policy dispute is how far right-to-repair rules should go without weakening safety, emissions controls, cybersecurity, or warranty protections. A tractor breaking during planting is not like a phone screen cracking. Timing matters. Farmers need real repair access, but I also do not want a loophole that lets people disable emissions systems and call it repair.

How should federal policy handle farmers’ right to repair modern equipment?

Overall results

1
58% support · excluded by 9%
7

Give farmers more local options without turning every software system loose. Certification can keep repairs competent.

2
55% support · excluded by 3%
7

The line should be repair yes, defeat devices no. Regulators can require access while protecting emissions rules.

3
54% support · excluded by 3%
7

Farmers own the machine. They should not lose a harvest waiting for a dealer laptop.

4
45% support · excluded by 6%
6

Federal micromanagement could make equipment more expensive and harder to support. Contracts already define what buyers get.

5
39% support · excluded by 11%
7

The worst harm is downtime when crops are ready. Require emergency access first, then evaluate broader rules.

About the author