Jackson voters will consider a November charter amendment that would change the City Treasurer from an elected office to a position appointed by the City Council, with the new structure scheduled to take effect after the current election cycle. The issue grew out of a recent treasurer vacancy and discussion about the technical requirements of the job. Supporters of appointment argue that the city could recruit and evaluate candidates based on professional financial qualifications. Opponents argue that an independently elected treasurer answers directly to residents and provides a separate source of accountability inside city government. The Treasurer's Office administers property-tax and city income-tax functions. This is really a question about what kind of accountability we want. Elections give an official an independent mandate; appointments make it easier to insist on professional qualifications and coordinated management. Either structure changes who can remove or reward the person responsible for an important financial office.
Who should ultimately choose Jackson's City Treasurer: voters or the City Council?