Public Comment

The FDA revoked authorization for FD&C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs, with food manufacturers given until January 2027 to reformulate. HHS and FDA have also encouraged broader removal of petroleum-based synthetic dyes, and FDA has tracked industry pledges to remove certified color additives, including commitments related to school meals. Several states have also debated or passed school-food restrictions on synthetic dyes and other additives. The debate is whether schools should move faster than federal rules, whether bans should cover all school food or only meals, and whether compliance costs could make school food harder to provide. Parents want school food to be safe and simple, but schools also need rules they can actually follow without raising costs.

How should schools handle synthetic food dyes in meals and snacks?

Overall results

1
62% support
7

A schoolwide rule protects students whose families cannot control every cafeteria or vending-machine choice.

7

Schools should not wait years to remove additives that parents are already being told to watch closely.

2
55% support · excluded by 7%
7

A phased rule gives districts and suppliers time to reformulate without scrambling lunch programs.

7

Schools can start with federally reimbursed meals, then use purchasing contracts to cover vending and à la carte foods.

3
52% support · excluded by 10%
7

Waiting for FDA timelines reduces confusion for food suppliers serving schools in multiple states.

7

Schools should not have to manage a separate food-additive rule when federal regulators already set national standards.

4
30% support · excluded by 12%

About the author