Public Comment

On November 3, 2026, Oakland County voters will decide whether to renew and restore a dedicated property-tax millage supporting the Detroit Zoo through the Oakland County Zoological Authority. The ballot asks for a total 0.10-mill rate for ten years, covering 2028 through 2037: 0.0927 mill would be renewed and 0.0073 mill would restore an earlier legally required reduction. At that rate, the tax is ten cents per $1,000 of taxable property value. Election materials estimate approximately $8.83 million in first-year collections, subject to the actual tax base and levy. The money supports animal care, education, conservation programs and facilities serving visitors from the region. Supporters argue that shared county funding provides stability for a public cultural institution. Critics question whether property taxes should be committed for another decade, particularly when households face competing obligations. A smaller or shorter alternative could be proposed in the future, but the current ballot asks for approval or rejection of the specified full renewal and restoration. The zoo is a regional asset, but the millage question is also a promise to collect property taxes for another decade. I think the discussion should make clear that the restoration is only part of the requested rate, and that educational services, animal care and facilities have ongoing costs. Voters deserve to know both what their money buys and what would change without it.

Should Oakland County renew and restore the Detroit Zoo property-tax millage?

Overall results

1
65% support · excluded by 10%
7

Animal care and facility maintenance cannot be turned on and off with annual fundraising cycles. Dedicated regional support helps the zoo plan services that children, families and schools use throughout the year.

4

Families benefit from regional educational institutions even when they cannot visit every month. A defined tax rate lets voters weigh those benefits against a specific household cost rather than an unknown request.

2
43% support · excluded by 5%
7

Ten years is a long commitment. A smaller amount or shorter duration would let taxpayers revisit whether public support is buying the promised educational and conservation value.

3

Renewal and restoration are separate policy choices even when joined on this ballot. A later proposal could make the additional 0.0073 mill easier to evaluate on its own.

3
38% support · excluded by 20%
7

Every dedicated levy limits households' ability to respond to other expenses. The zoo should present a sustainable plan that does not automatically renew taxpayer commitments each decade.

7

A visitor institution should be careful about relying on general property owners, including those who never use it. Admissions, philanthropy and earned income should carry more of the operating burden.

About the author