Public Comment

Ukraine is defending itself against Russia’s full-scale invasion, which began in 2022. U.S. involvement can take several forms: sending equipment from U.S. stocks, funding new weapons and services, selling weapons, training Ukrainian forces, helping allies coordinate aid, and supporting repairs or production. Several programs are often mentioned. Presidential Drawdown Authority lets the president send equipment from U.S. military stocks. The Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative funds new purchases and services for Ukraine. Foreign Military Financing helps partners buy U.S. defense goods. Air defense means systems that try to stop missiles, drones, and aircraft before they hit targets. Another tool is PURL, the Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List, which lets NATO allies and partners put money into a NATO-managed account to buy U.S. weapons and services for Ukraine. Public oversight reports say that from February 2022 through December 2025, the United States had committed more than $66.1 billion in defense articles and services to Ukraine, while allies and partners had committed about $120 billion. In May 2026, the U.S. also approved a potential sale of JDAM-ER equipment to Ukraine. A potential sale approval is not the same as final delivery. The debate is about how to balance Ukraine’s defense needs, U.S. costs, allied burden-sharing, U.S. weapons stockpiles, oversight, and the risk of a wider conflict. This asks how the United States should balance helping Ukraine defend itself with cost, oversight, allied responsibility, and escalation risk.

What should the United States prioritize in its support for Ukraine’s defense over the next year?

Overall results

1
56% support · excluded by 5%
7

A defensive focus can protect civilians and infrastructure while lowering the chance that U.S. support is seen as open-ended escalation.

2
53% support · excluded by 11%
7

Helping Ukraine make and repair more equipment at home could make its defense more sustainable over time.

7

Joint production can support Ukraine while also expanding supply of drones, ammunition, and air defense parts.

3
51% support · excluded by 11%
7

Broad support gives Ukraine the best chance to resist Russia and negotiate from a stronger position.

6

A steady U.S. role can reassure allies and show that invasions do not get rewarded.

4
48% support · excluded by 11%
7

European countries are closer to the conflict and should carry more of the cost when U.S. weapons are used.

5
48% support · excluded by 11%
4

Reducing military aid could lower U.S. costs and push more attention toward ending the war through talks and pressure on Russia.

6
39% support · excluded by 16%
7

Clearer goals and reporting can help taxpayers see what aid is meant to do and whether it is working.

About the author