Public Comment

FEMA helps after major disasters like hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, and wildfires. On May 7, 2026, the FEMA Review Council released a final report with recommendations for changing how federal disaster response works. The report points toward states, local governments, Tribal governments, and territories taking more of the lead, with the federal government acting more as support. Some recommendations would try to make aid faster and simpler, including direct funding to governments and a simpler individual assistance program. Other parts would raise the bar for when federal aid is triggered, which counties and cities warn could mean less federal presence and more cost placed on local governments. Many of the biggest changes would need Congress to act before becoming law. The debate is whether disaster response should stay strongly national because disasters can overwhelm local budgets, or whether states and communities should carry more responsibility because they know local risks best and may act faster. When a storm wipes out a town, people need help that is fast, clear, and reliable. I want FEMA fixed, but I do not want families stuck waiting while every level of government argues over who is responsible.

How should the federal government change disaster aid after the FEMA Review Council report?

Overall results

1
53% support · excluded by 9%
7

Federal disaster programs often turn into slow paperwork machines. Send more money directly to states with clear rules, then let them solve the problem without waiting for Washington to approve every step.

2
51% support · excluded by 9%
7

The best answer is not to weaken FEMA or protect every old process. Keep the national backstop, but simplify the forms, make standards clearer, and get money moving faster after a declared disaster.

7

Disaster aid is too important for a swing from one extreme to another. Congress should improve FEMA carefully: faster payments, fewer confusing programs, and clear oversight so the money still goes where it is supposed to go.

3
51% support · excluded by 11%
7

A county knows its roads, shelters, and trouble spots better than Washington does. But when the damage is too big, the federal government still has to show up. The line between local and federal should be clearer.

7

Emergency managers need a chain of command that works before the storm hits. States can lead the first moves, but FEMA should remain ready with money, logistics, and people when a disaster crosses local capacity.

4
47% support · excluded by 9%
1

The federal government should help when a disaster is truly beyond state capacity. For smaller events, states and local governments should budget for risk instead of pushing more costs onto national taxpayers.

5
46% support · excluded by 13%
7

Families do not choose whether a tornado, flood, or fire hits their town. A national disaster system exists because some communities cannot recover on their own. FEMA should be better funded and easier to use, not pushed away from the people who need help.

5

Bigger storms and hotter fire seasons are not local problems only. If the federal role shrinks while disasters grow, the poorest places will be left with the highest risk and the smallest tax base.

About the author