Public Comment

Congress is preparing the next multi-year surface transportation bill. The current federal law expires on September 30, 2026, so Congress must decide how to fund and shape the next law. The debate includes repair needs, highway capacity, transit, safety, federal spending, and how drivers should help pay for the system. The federal gas tax has long helped pay for roads, but electric vehicles do not buy gasoline, so some lawmakers want new EV or mileage-based fees. Transportation funding affects daily travel, road safety, local budgets, business costs, and federal taxes. A good bill may need to balance repairs, new projects, transportation choices, and who pays.

What should Congress prioritize in the next federal transportation funding bill?

Overall results

1
53% support · excluded by 7%
7

A repair-first bill can give taxpayers visible results and avoid larger emergency costs when bridges, pavement, or tunnels fail.

7

Repairing existing roads and bridges first protects past investments and can reduce safety risks before money goes to new lanes.

2
53% support · excluded by 6%
5

EV and mileage-based fees can make road funding more even as gas-tax revenue becomes a weaker match for road use.

3
53% support · excluded by 7%
7

Transit and safer streets give people more ways to get around, including people who cannot drive or cannot afford a car.

7

Buses, rail, walking, and biking can reduce traffic pressure without widening every road, especially in crowded areas.

4
49% support · excluded by 11%
7

States and local governments often know their own roads, transit needs, and growth patterns better than federal agencies.

5
47% support · excluded by 9%
7

Adding capacity on key corridors can reduce bottlenecks for commuters, freight trucks, buses, and emergency travel.

6
43% support · excluded by 7%
6

A restrained bill can focus on urgent needs while limiting pressure on federal debt and future taxpayers.

About the author