Public Comment

The federal government finalized a two-year Colorado River operating plan that imposes substantial reductions on Arizona, California and Nevada beginning in 2027. The Lower Basin states are expected to absorb about a 21% reduction, with the possibility of substantially deeper cuts after 2028 if reservoir conditions remain poor. Arizona officials have objected to the allocation of responsibility and discussed preserving legal options. The immediate state choice is whether to emphasize litigation and interstate bargaining, accelerate internal conservation and compensation, or combine both while preparing permanently for a smaller river supply. Arizona can fight over whether the cuts are fair and still prepare for the possibility that less river water is the long-term reality.

Which response best protects Arizona under the new Colorado River cuts?

Overall results

1
71% support
7

Conservation programs should purchase measurable water savings rather than subsidize projects whose actual effect on river demand is unclear.

7

Negotiating leverage and practical adaptation are not mutually exclusive, and abandoning either one prematurely could increase Arizona's future costs.

2
43% support · excluded by 10%
7

Long-term planning around lower river flows can reduce the risk of much harsher emergency cuts later.

3
36% support · excluded by 10%

About the author