Public Comment

North Carolina Governor Josh Stein signed Senate Bill 695. He described the law as encouraging partnerships between local governments and developers to increase housing availability and affordability as housing costs rise. The debate is how much the state should lean on public-private partnerships to address housing costs. Supporters say local governments often need private builders, land, financing, and faster coordination to add homes. Critics worry that partnership can become a subsidy for developers unless affordability requirements, infrastructure, design, and community benefits are clear. Partnerships can work, but only if everybody knows the bargain. Builders need predictable rules, and communities need homes that normal workers can afford.

What should North Carolina prioritize as it pushes local housing partnerships?

Overall results

1
58% support
7

A mountain county, a fast-growing suburb, and a small town do not have the same housing market. Local officials should decide which partnerships fit.

2
52% support
7

When private profit drives the deal, affordability can become secondary. Public money should build public or nonprofit-controlled housing.

3
48% support · excluded by 9%
7

Homes need pipes, roads, schools, and emergency services. The state should reward projects that fit existing infrastructure or clearly pay for upgrades.

4
47% support · excluded by 6%
7

If public land, tax tools, or staff time are part of the deal, affordability should be locked in. Otherwise the public may subsidize housing it still cannot afford.

5
44% support
7

Local governments cannot build enough housing alone. If partnerships bring land, financing, and builders together faster, North Carolina should use them.

About the author