Public Comment

The Maricopa County Stadium District owns Chase Field, while the Arizona Diamondbacks operate and maintain it under a 2018 agreement that runs through the 2027 season. A 2025 state law created a new mechanism redirecting taxes generated at the ballpark into a renovation fund governed by a new board. The Diamondbacks say lease negotiations are making little progress while the stadium faces an estimated $600 million in repairs, including roughly $80 million described as urgent. Because the new tax-backed renovation money depends in practice on a durable operating arrangement, the lease determines how public funding, team obligations, maintenance and long-term use of a county-owned asset fit together. Keeping a major league stadium functional has real economic value, but a long lease is when the public can define who pays, who maintains the building and what happens when costs exceed projections.

Which safeguards should matter most in a new Chase Field lease?

Overall results

1
66% support · excluded by 8%
7

A durable agreement should survive changes in ownership, revenues and political leadership. Precise responsibilities now can prevent another public-private dispute when the next major repair arrives.

7

Public tax revenue should be paired with a detailed capital plan, maintenance standards, audit rights and rules for cost overruns. A lease is the strongest moment to establish those obligations.

2
47% support · excluded by 6%
7

If the economics of the renovation only work when government absorbs most of the capital burden, the parties should reconsider the scale of the project rather than loosen the lease.

7

A professional sports franchise gains directly from a modernized home venue. Publicly generated stadium taxes should supplement, not substitute for, substantial private investment.

3
45% support · excluded by 10%
7

Chase Field supports jobs, downtown activity and a major professional franchise. Certainty around the lease lets contractors, workers and the team plan investments instead of waiting through another season.

7

Delayed repairs become more expensive and harder to schedule around baseball seasons. The funding framework already exists, so prolonged negotiation can destroy value without improving the stadium.

4
41% support · excluded by 12%
7

The county should not negotiate against an artificial deadline created by the team. Fix genuine safety problems now and make the franchise prove the long-term deal is worth hundreds of millions.

About the author