Public Comment

Automated Driving Systems, or ADS, perform the driving task at higher automation levels. NHTSA’s 2026 report to Congress summarized ongoing research and rulemaking for ADS-equipped vehicles, and the agency has been working on how federal standards should apply to vehicles that may not have traditional driver controls. The debate is how to balance faster deployment, safety evidence, state and local control, crash reporting, cybersecurity, and accessibility benefits. Driverless cars might reduce some crashes someday, but “someday” is not enough. If these vehicles are on public roads now, the public deserves clear proof, reporting, and accountability.

What should federal rules require before driverless vehicles expand on public roads?

Overall results

1
54% support · excluded by 3%
7

A fifty-state rulebook slows investment and confuses compliance. Safety standards should be national.

2
51% support · excluded by 9%
7

A dense downtown, a snowbelt suburb, and a desert highway are different environments. Local governments need authority.

3
49% support · excluded by 6%
7

Companies should show how the system handles real-world hazards before thousands of vehicles are deployed.

4
48% support · excluded by 9%
7

The country needs real data, not press releases. Require reporting that regulators and researchers can use.

5
46% support · excluded by 17%
7

Public roads are not private test tracks. A pause is reasonable until rights, liability, and safety rules catch up.

About the author