Public Comment

Traverse City voters will decide whether to approve the Downtown Development Authority's Infrastructure First Tax Increment Financing plan for 2028 through 2047. Under the proposal, 70% of applicable growth in property-tax revenue within the district would be captured for eligible public infrastructure while 30% would flow to participating taxing jurisdictions, including the city's General Fund. The city estimates total capture over the 20-year term at roughly $140 million, although the actual amount would depend on future taxable-value growth. TIF is not a new millage; the dispute is about where future growth in existing tax revenue should go. Downtown infrastructure eventually has to be paid for. The real choice is whether future downtown tax growth should be reserved in advance for that work or flow more fully to the city, county, library, and other taxing bodies to compete with their other priorities.

Is a 20-year Infrastructure First TIF the right financing structure for downtown Traverse City?

Overall results

1
55% support · excluded by 9%
7

Reinvesting part of downtown's tax-base growth in the infrastructure supporting that growth can strengthen the district without imposing a separate millage.

7

Streets, sidewalks, parking, riverfront work, and other downtown infrastructure require long-range capital planning; a dedicated revenue stream makes projects more predictable.

2
52% support · excluded by 5%
7

Normal taxing jurisdictions should receive the growth in their tax base and decide through ordinary budgets whether downtown projects deserve funding.

3
45% support · excluded by 7%
7

Financing projects individually makes the cost, benefit, and priority of each investment visible rather than precommitting a large future revenue stream.

7

The city's highest priority twenty years from now may not be downtown infrastructure, and today's voters cannot know every future need.

4
45% support · excluded by 11%
7

Periodic review points would let voters or commissioners adjust if revenue or infrastructure needs differ materially from today's assumptions.

7

Twenty years and 70% are substantial commitments; a smaller capture can preserve infrastructure funding while returning more growth to other public services.

About the author