Public Comment

Macomb County officials have been developing a November 3 public-transportation millage renewal involving SMART fixed-route and paratransit service as well as local community transportation. A notable feature under discussion would return 12.5% of millage revenue to communities for locally tailored transit needs. That creates a real design choice before the election: maintain a strongly regional system, shift more resources toward municipal control, or use a hybrid in which regional trunk service and local last-mile programs are explicitly funded together. Regional buses and local senior or disability transportation solve different problems. A renewal should make clear which level is responsible for each trip.

What transit model should Macomb County ask voters to fund this November?

Overall results

1
63% support · excluded by 11%
7

Regional routes can connect major destinations while local shares let communities solve specific first-mile and senior-transportation gaps.

7

A hybrid can preserve accessible regional service without forcing every community to serve lower-density riders in exactly the same way.

2
45% support · excluded by 7%
7

A transportation network works best when routes, frequencies and transfers are planned as one system rather than divided by municipal borders.

3
43% support · excluded by 4%
7

Greater local control is defensible if minimum regional service standards prevent fragmentation from making cross-community trips harder.

About the author