Public Comment

Proposition 39 would amend California’s Constitution to require government-issued identification at polling places or the last four digits of a government-issued identification number for mail voting. It would require the state to provide voter-identification cards on request and require elections officials to report annually the percentage of voters in each county whose citizenship verification is complete. Current registration already requires applicants to attest under penalty of perjury that they are citizens and provide identity information. State fiscal analysts estimate substantial implementation and continuing administrative costs. Election rules need to make fraud difficult without turning ordinary documentation problems into lost votes. Free identification and a correction process matter as much as the nominal ID requirement if the goal is both confidence and access.

Which identity checks should California require when people vote?

Overall results

1
59% support · excluded by 10%
7

County reporting can expose inconsistent verification performance and help identify whether new requirements produce avoidable errors.

7

Verification should measure eligibility, not paperwork quality, so administrative mismatches need notice and meaningful time to correct them.

2
50% support · excluded by 10%
7

Different voting methods can use different safeguards while still applying a clear identity check to people appearing at a polling place.

7

A free state ID can make an in-person rule workable without making voters purchase special documentation.

3
44% support · excluded by 12%
7

Adding document requirements can create more rejected or delayed ballots without evidence that the existing system routinely accepts ineligible voters.

3
44% support · excluded by 12%
7

The clearest eligibility rule is affirmative documentation rather than relying primarily on attestations and database matching.

About the author